One Of The World’s Most Eminent Climate Scientists Changes Stance On Global Warming
Collective Evolution
One Of The World’s Most Eminent Climate Scientists Changes Stance On Global Warming
from Collective Evolution
Considered by some to be one of the world’s most eminent climate scientists, who has supported the theory of global warming for decades, has now shifted his opinion and become a skeptic of it.
Yes climate change is happening and it’s to be noted. But climate change is often linked with global warming, if there is a dramatic shift in our weather then our corporate media instantly attributes it to global warming. The idea of global warming has been marketed and pushed on us so much so that anybody who questions it is made out to look like a fool.
For other skeptics out there, you are not alone, in fact, you are joined by hundreds of renowned scientists all over the world, including Professor Lennart Bengtsson who was recently added to the list. (1)(2)(3)(4)
Bengtsson is a researcher at the University of Reading, he is a Swedish climatologist, former director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg and winner of the 51st IMO Prize of the World Meteorological Organization for his pioneering work in numerical weather prediction. He is most likely the most distinguished scientist yet to change his perspective on the global warming issue.
Four of the world’s top climate scientists (one of them being Bengtsson) had their recent research rejected by one of the world’s top academic journals. The journal states that the paper contained error and did not provide a significant advancement in the field, and therefore failed to meet the journal’s required acceptance criteria. They say that the paper is harmful “as it opens the door for oversimplified claims of ‘errors’ and worse from the climate skeptics media side.”
The paper suggested that the climate might be less sensitive to greenhouse gases than had been claimed by the IPCC in its report last September, and recommended that more work be carried out to reduce the underlying uncertainty. He isn’t the only one who’s discord this, that will come later in the article.
“The problem we have now in the scientific community is that some scientists are mixing up their scientific role with that of climate activist. It is an indication of how science is gradually being influenced by political views. I am worried about the gradual influence of political views on science. Policy decisions need to be based on solid fact. The reality hasn’t been keeping up with the computer models.”(2)(3) – Professor Bengtsson
Please leave a comment, and don’t forget to follow us for more articles and videos on Google+, Twitter, via RSS feed, or by simply subscribing to our newsletter at the end of this page!
organictalks.com
2 Comments
Leave a Comment
Visit Stanka on Fine Art America
I have one thing to say, the weather changes every day ,month ,year and so on. At one time ice was hundreds of feet high over most of north america. At other times Alaska had rain frosts. We have only been liveing on this planet for such a short time in the grand sachem of things this is just an instant in time and the earth will find is own correct temp in-spite of what we do
…and most importantly: No one should claim to know the final verdict – because there is none. Humans surely have an impact on this planet, but as you said it, this planet has been through a lot of things – sometimes much worse than what is happening right now. Thanks Mike.